top of page

The Invisible Epidemic- the Growing Public Health Catastrophe of Microplastics

  • drjoelasek
  • 4 days ago
  • 11 min read

Plastics first emerged in the early 20th century as a revolutionary material, prized for being lightweight, durable, and versatile. The earliest fully synthetic plastic, Bakelite, was invented in 1907 and quickly found use in electrical components and consumer goods. World War II accelerated plastic innovation, as the material replaced scarce resources like rubber, silk, and metals. After the war, plastic production exploded, fueling a consumer culture of convenience — from food packaging and disposable utensils to synthetic textiles and medical devices.


Global production rose from just 2 million metric tons in the 1950s to over 400 million metric tons annually today, with demand still climbing. What is truly terrifying to contemplate is that if current trends continue, worldwide plastic use is projected to nearly triple over the next 30 years, surpassing one billion metric tons annually by mid-century!!! What began as a marvel of modern chemistry has become a defining feature of modern life — and one of the most potentially disastrous environmental crises of our time.


That’s because plastics aren’t going anywhere and plastic particles are, literally, everywhere.  Much plastic is used to make containers for water, food, and everyday pharmaceuticals, which can therefore become contaminated by microplastics and nanoplastics (often referred to collectively and abbreviated as “MNPs”). Synthetic fabrics shed large amounts of MNPs in the form of microfibers. In cities, friction between tires and pavement generates large quantities of MNPs. MNPs have also been intentionally manufactured as components of toothpaste, cosmetics, industrial abrasives, paints, and other products. Plastic waste is also incinerated, releasing incomplete combustion residues and chemical substances into the air. Or it is buried in landfills, from which plastic fragments can be released into soil and groundwater. Finally, just under one quarter of the plastic produced each year is released into the environment in an uncontrolled way, and from there it can contaminate water and food consumed by humans.


Plastics don’t really “degrade” in the way organic materials do — instead, they break down into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually becoming MNPs that can persist indefinitely in the environment.   Although there is no universally accepted definition, microplastics are often described as particles between 5 mm and 1 µm in size, while nanoplastics range from 1 µm down to 1 nm.


The time it takes for visible plastic objects to fragment depends on the type of plastic, the conditions (sunlight, heat, oxygen, microbes), and where they end up (landfill, ocean, soil). Here are some rough estimates often cited:

  • Plastic bags: 10–20 years

  • Plastic straws: ~200 years

  • Plastic bottles: 450+ years

  • Fishing line: 600+ years

  • Styrofoam (polystyrene): 500+ years


But, importantly, even after centuries, plastics don’t disappear — they just become tiny particles that remain in ecosystems, where they can enter the food chain and accumulate in air, water, and soil. And that is exactly the problem with plastics: MNPs embed themselves everywhere in our environment from the tops of the tallest mountains to the deepest parts of the ocean and even through the air: Phys.org


Sources (blue) and sinks (orange) of atmospheric microplastics. Credit: npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41612-025-00914-3


What We Know (and Don’t Know) About Microplastics & Nanoplastics in Our Bodies

As we have begun to the study the biological impact if these silent invaders more and more, we are finding them in the foods we eat and inside our bodies. MNPs have now been found in many human tissues including lungs, liver, kidney, placenta, lipid-rich arterial plaques, and most chillingly, the brain. While definitive proof of harm is not yet established, the accumulating evidence suggests we should take this extremely seriously.


Here’s what current science shows, what remains unclear, and what you can do now.


Health Risks: What Animal, Cell, & Early Human Studies Have Shown

Though human data is still limited, there is growing evidence pointing toward likely risks:


  • Inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell damage: In cells and animals, MNPs have been shown to induce oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and cell death. (PMC)


  • Digestive system effects: MNPs ingested via food or water may physically irritate tissues in the gut, alter the intestinal microbiome (i.e. beneficial vs harmful bacteria), and interfere with absorption. (PMC)


  • Reproductive and developmental effects: Studies in animals show impacts on sperm, ovarian follicles, hormone levels. Human studies show that MNPs are present in every placenta examined in one study, negatively impact fertility and sperm quality and are possibly associated with low birth weight and preterm labor. (ACS Publications)


  • Respiratory system: Inhaled MNPs may cause oxidative stress in lungs, inflammation, changes in lung function. Some animal and in vitro evidence also suggest potential for more serious lung disease. (PMC)


  • Cardiovascular disease risk: Emerging human studies have found MNPs arterial plaques. One study associating plastics in carotid plaque with elevated risk of stroke or heart attack. (New England Journal of Medicine)


  • Plastic in the Brain Exceeds Other Organs: A study from Nature Medicine by Matthew Campen and colleagues measured MNPs in human autopsy tissues (brain, liver, kidney). Contrary to what they expected to find, they found the brain had much higher concentrations than liver or kidneys. The breach presumably comes from very small plastic particles that can cross the blood-brain barrier, perhaps aided by weakening of that barrier (e.g. due to aging, inflammation or disease).


    In the average person studied, the amount of plastic found in the brain was equivalent to one sandwich bag! In people with dementia, the amounts measured were especially high — comparable to 10 sandwich bags of plastic! (on their rough scale).



Many Pathways to Exposure

Microplastics & nanoplastics get into our bodies in many ways, often without our noticing:


  • Food:

    Contamination from packaging, processing, the environment (soil, water). Seafood especially tends to accumulate plastic. Another study of U.S. markets found microplastics in 16 commonly-consumed protein products. Highly processed seafood had more MNPs; e.g. breaded shrimp had much higher counts per gram than less processed or fresh equivalents. (ScienceDirect)


  • Seafood:

    Seafood is often promoted for its nutritional benefits. But it’s also a significant pathway for ingesting plastics. Here’s what research shows:


    A systematic review and meta-analysis looked at MNP contamination across seafood (fish, mollusks, crustaceans) intended for human consumption. It found that almost all seafood products sampled contained MNPs to some degree. Environmental Health Perspectives+2ResearchGate+2


    In shellfish (like mussels, oysters) and smaller creatures that are eaten whole, the risk is higher, because anything contained in the digestive tract of the seafood is more likely to be ingested by humans. PMC+1


    One study found plastic fragments larger than 200 micrometers in the digestive tract of ~71% of tested specimens across many marine species, though muscle tissue (what humans often eat) showed less consistent evidence of plastics. ScienceDirect+1


    Humans consuming seafood regularly accumulate higher levels of MNPs in body fluids and tissues (though “higher levels” are often still small in absolute amount). The health consequences over long time or for vulnerable people (pregnant, infants, elderly) remain under investigation. PMC+2U.S. Food and Drug Administration+2

             

  • Microwaving Food in Plastic:

    One particularly concerning everyday practice: heating food in plastic containers (microwaving, hot foods stored in plastic, etc.). Heat, acid, and fat all increase the likelihood that chemicals embedded or attached to the plastic (or the plastic itself) migrate or leach into food. Some specifics:

    • Foods like oils, cheeses, tomato sauce, vinegar, sodas are more reactive/acidic/fatty and tend to draw chemicals from plastic containers more readily.


    • One study found that microwaving food in plastic containers or reusable plastic pouches can release millions of microplastic particles and billions of nanoplastic particles per square centimeter in just 3 minutes.


    • Experts (public health physicians, epidemiologists) recommend: “never microwave in plastic”, and avoid storing hot/acidic/fatty foods in plastic. (The Guardian)

 

  • Beverages:  

    Bottled water often has many more plastic particles than tap water. In fact, this study found that an average 1 L bottle of water contains about 250,000 pieces of microplastics! (Nanoplastics Discovered in Bottled Water) Tea bags (especially those with plastic components) can release huge numbers of particles when steeped in near-boiling water. (Harvard Medicine Magazine).


    A recent study from France’s ANSES (their national food safety agency) shakes up the assumption that plastic bottles are “worse” than glass or cans when it comes to microplastic contamination. They found that soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea, and beer packaged in glass bottles had on average about 100 microplastic particles per liter! (Anses+2ScienceAlert+2)  That level was 5 to 50 times higher than in the same kinds of drinks packaged in plastic bottles or metal cans. (Phys.org) Water, whether still or sparkling, had relatively low numbers: ~4.5 particles per liter in glass bottles, ~1.6 in plastic bottles or cartons. Where are these plastics coming from? Bottle caps appear to be a major source. The plastic particles in drink samples often matched in polymer type, color, and shape the paint used on the metal caps that seal glass bottles. Friction during storage (caps knocking, being handled, etc.) likely causes microabrasions in that paint, which then sheds particles that get into the drink. The study also found that simple cleaning of the caps (rinsing, blowing off, maybe using alcohol) before opening can reduce microplastic contamination by up to about 60%. Anses+1


  • Chewing Gum:

    This one really surprised (and disappointed) me. As someone who loves chewing gum for its potential benefits for oral health and numerous potential mental health benefits including improvements in mood/anxiety/alertness/attention, I was startled to read the recent study from UCLA researchers (Mohanty & Lowe, presented at the ACS Spring 2025 meeting). They found that chewing gum—both synthetic (petroleum-based) and so-called “natural” gum (made with plant polymers like chicle)—can release hundreds to thousands of microplastic particles into saliva, many of which are likely swallowed. On average, the researchers found that a single piece could shed up to ~3,000 plastic particles. Most of those particles are released early: about 94% in the first 8 minutes of chewing, due to the mechanical abrasion of chewing rather than chemical action by saliva. (UCLA+2ScienceDaily+2). What’s even more discouraging is that this may actually be a gross underestimate. Another study by scientists at the University of Belfast found that a single piece of gum can release 250,000 microplastics into your body if chewed over the course of an hour! (Daily Mail Online)


  • Inhalation:

    Indoor air (dust, synthetic fibers from carpets, upholstery, clothing) and outdoor air can both be important sources. Many microplastics are small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs. This research article from 2023 found that the average person breathes in about 1 credit card worth of plastic per week!  (PMC)


  • Skin contact: Though this route is less well understood, there is potential for transfer from cosmetics, personal care products, and synthetic textiles. (ScienceDirect)


What the Science Suggests We Do Now

Even though many uncertainties remain, there is enough evidence to justify taking concrete and immediate steps to reduce our exposure to microplastics. Here are practical ways based on recent research and expert recommendations.


Practical Ways to Avoid Microplastics & Reduce Use of Plastics

Here are strategies you can adopt in your daily life to reduce plastic exposure and usage:

Area

What to Change

Why It Helps


Kitchen

&

Food Storage

• Use glass, stainless steel, or ceramic containers instead of plastic for storing food, especially hot, acidic, or fatty foods.


Never microwave food in plastic; transfer to a non-plastic container


Replace plastic & nylon utensils with wood, stainless steel, or silicone ones.


Use wooden or bamboo cutting boards rather than plastic boards.

Plastic products shed tens of thousands of particles into water. Aluminum bottles are coated with BPA/plastic to prevent corrosion and can also shed this into water. Heat accelerates leaching of chemicals and microplastics from plastic containers into food. Alternatives drastically cut ingestion.


Drinks

&

Packaging

Drink filtered tap water instead of bottled water; if using bottled, choose glass or metal when possible.


If using reusable bottles, pick high-quality stainless steel or glass.


Avoid plastic tea bags or bags sealed with plastic; loose leaf or paper tea bags are better.


• Avoid packaging that is plastic-lined or plastic coated for acidic/fatty foods.

Plastic packages (and caps) shed tens of thousands of particles into water. Some nylon or “silky” tea bags release billions of particles per cup when steeped in hot water.


Foods

&

Diet

Eat less highly processed food; many processed items come with more plastic packaging and more plastic contamination


Reduce intake of red meat (fatty meats also accumulate more than leaner cuts).


Eat more plant-based whole foods; less packaging and fewer plastic exposures.


Wash fruits and vegetables to remove surface microplastics settled from air and dust. 


Rinse rice (or other grains) before cooking (Mission Health)


Choose fillets over whole shellfish; limit highly processed seafood like breaded shrimp.


Limit chewing gum until clearer evidence emerges about its safety

Plant based foods contain the fewest microplastics (as long as they’re washed before-hand)


Shellfish, seafood and processed products contain more plastics, while other cuts carry less. Processed foods contain far more microplastics than less processed alternatives. 


Fatty/oily and acidic foods (like tomato sauce or cheese) draw out more chemicals and microplastics from plastic packaging.


Laundry, Clothing

&

Textiles

Choose natural fibers (cotton, wool, hemp) instead of synthetics like polyester, nylon whenever possible.


Wash synthetic garments less often, on cold, full loads.


Install filters (lint filters, microfiber filters) on washing machines where possible.


Air dry (line-dry) when possible instead of tumble drying.

Washing and drying synthetics releases thousands of plastic microfibers into water and air.


Indoor Environment &

Air

Vacuum and mop floors regularly to remove dust that contains microplastics.


Use HEPA filters in vacuums and air purifiers.


Reduce use of synthetic carpeting, upholstery, wall coverings if you can.


 • Avoid storing or using plastic goods in hot, sunny environments that accelerate breakdown.

Up to half of plastic exposure comes from inhalation of fibers and dust indoors.


Purchasing &

Lifestyle Choices

Refuse single-use plastics: bags, straws, utensils, take-out containers. Bring your own.


Support brands and products with minimal or plastic-free packaging


Buy items with fewer chemical additives and safer plastic types when plastic is unavoidable.


Recycle properly. Though recycling isn’t perfect, it helps reduce new plastic production.


Advocate and support policy/legislation aimed at limiting plastic production, setting standards for plastic safety, labeling, extended producer responsibility, etc.

The world is literally drowning in plastic. Using less in our personal lies while advocating for reduction of plastic use and eliminating single-use plastics is the only way to avoid what is becoming an environmental and public health catastrophe.



What We Still Don’t Know

  • How much exposure is safe, and whether there is a threshold below which there is no risk.

  • Exactly which forms (type of plastics, particle size, shape, chemical additives) are most harmful.

  • Longitudinal data in humans—cause & effect rather than mere association—particularly over long time spans or in sensitive populations (children, pregnant people, elderly).

  • The degree to which MNPs act as carriers for other toxic chemicals (e.g. heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, plastic additives) in real-world exposures.


What We Still Need: Research & Policy Gaps

To address the problem more thoroughly, scientists and policymakers should focus on:

  1. Standardizing measurement methods for MNPs  (so studies are comparable).

  2. Longitudinal human studies tracking exposure and health outcomes (especially in vulnerable populations: children, pregnant persons, elders).

  3. More detail on which plastics, what additives, which sizes/shapes are most toxic.

  4. Regulations that limit or ban problematic plastic additives, improve packaging standards, limit plastic waste, and ensure safer, biodegradable alternatives.

  5. Consumer transparency: labeling food and packaging to show what plastics are used, and their safety.


Bottom Line: What You Can Do Without Feeling Overwhelmed

Unfortunately given the current ubiquity of plastics in our lives, we won’t be able to eliminate microplastic/nanoplastic exposure entirely. That’s just not realistic in our modern world. But we can reduce our exposure and that will almost assuredly benefit the health of our ecosystem and our overall health (healthier foods, cleaner air/water, more natural materials).


Start small: shift one or two habits (e.g. stop microwaving plastic; switch from bottled water to glass; choose loose leaf tea). Over time, build more habits into your life.


This is a public health disaster in the making — the more you and other understand, the more pressure there will be for safer materials and better protections. Your habits matter. Your choices matter.

bottom of page